

Unauthorized Data Collection: Balancing Business Needs with Privacy Rights

September 10, 2024
By Tammy Chang
Senior Claims Specialist, Cyber, AXA XL
In a digital age where personal data is increasingly valuable to businesses looking to understand their customers better, the unauthorized collection of information has become a pressing concern.
Unauthorized collection refers to the gathering of information without proper consent or legal authority. This can occur when personal data is collected without the knowledge or permission of the individuals involved, which can lead to privacy violations and potential legal issues.
As the ethical and legal implications of data collection continue to evolve, businesses need to navigate a complex environment, where transparency and responsible data handling are vital in preserving customer trust and upholding privacy rights. Many countries have strict regulations governing the collection and use of personal data, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) in the United States. Violating these regulations can result in hefty fines and damage to the company's reputation.
The 色多多视频Cyber Claims team saw a noticeable increase in such claims arising out of statutes like California Information Privacy Act (CIPA), the Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) and the Genetic Information Privacy Act (GIPA), as well as older statutes repurposed for current privacy conditions, like the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA), and various state wiretap statutes. VPPA was originally passed in 1988 to protect individual’s video rental records containing personally identifiable information. It has currently been repurposed to include streaming platforms and digital video services.
Careful collection
Companies collect data on consumers through various methods, including:
- Website cookies: When you visit a website, it may place cookies on your device to track your online behavior and preferences.
- Loyalty programs: Companies collect data when consumers sign up for loyalty programs and make purchases, allowing them to track shopping habits and preferences.
- Social media: Many companies monitor social media platforms to gather data on consumer opinions, interests, and behavior.
- Surveys and feedback forms: Companies often collect data through surveys, feedback forms, and questionnaires to understand consumer preferences and experiences.
- Purchase history: Retailers and online stores collect data on consumers' purchase history to analyze buying patterns and preferences.
- Mobile apps: Companies may gather data through mobile apps, tracking user activity and behavior within the app.
Businesses can take several steps to ensure that they are not collecting information without authorization. First and foremost, they should clearly communicate to their customers what information they are collecting and for what purpose. This includes obtaining explicit consent from individuals before collecting their personal information.
Additionally, businesses should regularly review their data collection practices ensuring that they follow relevant privacy laws and regulations. For one, businesses need to provide individuals with the option to access, correct, or delete their personal information as required by data protection regulations, such as the GDPR in Europe or the CCPA in California. They should also implement robust data security measures to protect the information they do collect from unauthorized access or misuse.
Businesses need to provide individuals with the option to access, correct, or delete their personal information as required by data protection regulations, such as the GDPR in Europe or the CCPA in California.
Costly repercussions
It's important to note that companies are required to handle consumer data responsibly and in accordance with data protection regulations. If not collected or handled properly, the repercussions can be costly.
Recently, Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, settled with the state of Texas for $1.4 billion over allegations of illegally collecting biometric data without consent. This marks one of the largest penalties imposed on the tech giant. The lawsuit accused Meta of violating Texas' Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier (CUBI) Act and the Deceptive Trade Practices Act.
This settlement comes after Illinois amended its Biometric Information Privacy Act, reducing companies' liability for collecting biometric data without permission. This change follows previous large fines imposed on companies like Meta, Google, TikTok, and Snapchat for similar violations. The case also highlights a 2023 court ruling that significantly increased potential penalties for biometric data collection violations. The ruling stemmed from claims against White Castle Systems for scanning employee fingerprints without consent, prompting the company to settle for $9.4 million.
Trending mass arbitration
More businesses are also contending with a growing trend toward mass arbitration. Mass arbitration refers to a situation where a large group of individuals bring arbitration claims against a company for similar issues. This can occur when a company includes an arbitration clause in its contracts, and many individuals believe they have been harmed by the company's actions. In mass arbitration, the claims are usually consolidated and handled together, which can result in more efficient resolution of the disputes, but the process also involves hefty fees that can total millions of dollars. Although alternative dispute resolution offers benefits such as a more efficient process, quicker resolutions, lower costs, and confidentiality, the filing of mass arbitration claims and the misuse of the process can sometimes undermine these advantages for both parties.
The potential for class actions suits has not disappeared either. The main difference between mass arbitration and class action suits lies in the legal process and the way claims are handled. In mass arbitration, each individual claim is arbitrated separately, but the claims are consolidated and handled together for efficiency. Each person's claim is considered on its own merits, but the process is streamlined by addressing common issues collectively. In a class action lawsuit, however, a group of people with similar claims collectively bring a legal action against the defendant. In this scenario, the claims are not handled individually but are treated as a single lawsuit on behalf of the entire class. The outcome of the lawsuit applies to all members of the class, whether they actively participated in the legal proceedings or not.
Pushing back
Some businesses have taken to fighting such claims. In one case, French skincare company by filing a fraud lawsuit against a plaintiffs’ law firm. The suit claims that the law firm was ‘manufacturing’ mass arbitration claims under CIPA by having people visit the company’s website, claiming their privacy was violated by third-party tracking software. In a recent decision, a judge ruled that the company was not subject to arbitration agreements with the consumers simply because they might have visited L'Occitane's website.
According to the judge, even if he agreed that an arbitration agreement could exist simply through the act of accessing a website, the law firm and its clients did not show any evidence they had visited L'Occitane pages. This ruling determined that the law does not apply to publicly available websites like L'Occitane's. We hope this decision serves as a warning to the plaintiffs’ bar that the courts will not tolerate frivolous lawsuits or mass arbitrations.
Cyber protection
Unauthorized data collection can create significant liability issues for organizations. That’s why cyber insurance can be essential protection, offering coverage for legal costs, damages, and managing public relations fallout resulting from unauthorized data collection. But it’s important to note that coverage for unauthorized collection is not a given. A base cyber insurance form typically excludes coverage for unauthorized collection, which may be amended by endorsement.
By being transparent about their data collection practices, adhering to regulations, and prioritizing data security, businesses can reduce the risk of collecting information without authorization that will help them avoid legal repercussions and maintain a positive relationship with their customers.
To contact the author of this story, please complete the below form
More Articles
Related Resources


A cyber insurance backstop? Hold on — we need to build resiliency first

The role of captives and structured risk solutions in cyber risk management
Global Asset Protection Services, LLC, and its affiliates (鈥溕喽嗍悠礡isk Consulting鈥) provides risk assessment reports and other loss prevention services, as requested. In this respect, our property loss prevention publications, services, and surveys do not address life safety or third party liability issues. This document shall not be construed as indicating the existence or availability under any policy of coverage for any particular type of loss or damage. The provision of any service does not imply that every possible hazard has been identified at a facility or that no other hazards exist. 色多多视频Risk Consulting does not assume, and shall have no liability for the control, correction, continuation or modification of any existing conditions or operations. We specifically disclaim any warranty or representation that compliance with any advice or recommendation in any document or other communication will make a facility or operation safe or healthful, or put it in compliance with any standard, code, law, rule or regulation. Save where expressly agreed in writing, 色多多视频Risk Consulting and its related and affiliated companies disclaim all liability for loss or damage suffered by any party arising out of or in connection with our services, including indirect or consequential loss or damage, howsoever arising. Any party who chooses to rely in any way on the contents of this document does so at their own risk.
US- and Canada-Issued 色多多视频 Policies
In the US, the 色多多视频insurance companies are: Catlin 色多多视频 Company, Inc., Greenwich 色多多视频 Company, Indian Harbor 色多多视频 Company, XL 色多多视频 America, Inc., XL Specialty 色多多视频 Company and T.H.E. 色多多视频 Company. In Canada, coverages are underwritten by XL Specialty 色多多视频 Company - Canadian Branch and AXA 色多多视频 Company - Canadian branch. Coverages may also be underwritten by Lloyd’s Syndicate #2003. Coverages underwritten by Lloyd’s Syndicate #2003 are placed on behalf of the member of Syndicate #2003 by Catlin Canada Inc. Lloyd’s ratings are independent of AXA XL.
US domiciled insurance policies can be written by the following 色多多视频surplus lines insurers: XL Catlin 色多多视频 Company UK Limited, Syndicates managed by Catlin Underwriting Agencies Limited and Indian Harbor 色多多视频 Company. Enquires from US residents should be directed to a local insurance agent or broker permitted to write business in the relevant state.
色多多视频 as a controller, uses cookies to provide its services, improve user experience, measure audience engagement, and interact with users鈥 social network accounts among others. Some of these cookies are optional and we won't set optional cookies unless you enable them by clicking the "ACCEPT ALL" button. You can disable these cookies at any time via the "How to manage your cookie settings" section in our cookie policy.