

Dazed and confused: Are you administering the contract... or the construction?
June 17, 2019
By Al Rabasca
Director of Industry Relations,Design Professional
Design professionals use various terms in contracts, websites and correspondence to describe their services during the construction phase of a project.
For decades, many A/Es have used the term “construction administration” (instead of “contract administration”) to refer to services they provide during the construction phase of a project. Some lawyers, echoing their clients’ jargon, have also used “construction administration” in their writings and pleadings. The term has found its way into books, magazine articles, and even earlier editions of AXA XL’s Contract eGuide for Design Professionals. But is that the term you should be using?You won’t find “construction administration” anywhere in the American Institute of Architects (AIA) B101™-2017 Owner-Architect Agreement, the Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee (EJCDC®) E-500 2014 Standard Form Agreement Between Owner & Engineer for Professional Services or the Royal Architectural Institute of Canada (RAIC) Canadian Standard Form of Contract for Architectural Services – Document Six, 2018 Edition.Instead, the AIA documents use the term “administration of the contract.” Under “Construction Phase Services,” the B101 states the “Architect shall provide administration of the Contract between the Owner and the Contractor.” (Ditto AIA A201-2017 General Conditions of the Contract for Construction.) The EJCDC documents also use the term “construction contract administration” as well as “general administration of construction contract.” RAIC’s documents call it “administration of the construction contract.”The glossary in AIA’s The Architect’s Handbook of Professional Practice, Fifteenth Edition, defines “construction contract administration services” as:
Services for the architect’s general administration of the construction contract(s). This includes reviewing and certifying amounts due the contractor, reviewing the contractor’s submittals, preparing change orders, making site visits to observe progress of the work, and conducting site inspections to determine dates of substantial completion and final completion.
The term “construction administration” does not appear in the handbook’s glossary.1
Some industry professionals prefer to omit the word “construction” entirely, feeling that “contract administration” more appropriately describes an A/E’s services. According to Al Rabasca, AXA XL’s Director of Industry Relations, “A/Es are, after all, administering the contract, not the construction.”
In any case, many design professionals are moving away from using the term “construction administration.” “The term can be confusing,” Rabasca says. He points out that to a layperson, “administer” isn’t a far cry from “supervise” or “manage” and some—including clients—could mistakenly believe that “construction administration” means “construction supervision” or “construction management.”
“You can’t assume everyone, including jurors, understands what we intend when we use industry shorthand,” Rabasca says. “You just know that some lawyer somewhere would be able to persuade a jury that construction administration means managing the construction.”
What about “construction observation”?
Rabasca says many clients and even some emerging professionals also confuse “construction observation” with “construction contract administration.” The latter often includes the former, but the former definitely does not describe the latter (are you still with us?).
The Architect’s Handbook of Professional Practice defines “observation of the work” in this way:
That part of the architect’s contract administration services in which the architect visits the site to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the work completed to determine, in general, if the work observed is being performed in a manner indicating it will be in accordance with the contract documents when fully completed.
The bottom line
So, what term should you use? Rabasca says you’re better off using terms used by the AIA, EJCDC or RAIC. “Administration of the contract,” “construction contract administration” and “contract administration” more accurately describe a design professional’s role during construction phase services. “Being precise in our terminology is important,” Rabasca says. “It can help shape expectations, give clients and their lawyers one less toehold to try to distort what an A/E is responsible for, and ultimately reduce the risk of misunderstandings and disputes.”1 AIA’s The Architect’s Handbook of Professional Practice, Fifteenth Edition.
To contact the author of this story, please complete the below form
More Articles
- By Risk
- By Industry
- By Product
- By Region
Related Resources
Global Asset Protection Services, LLC, and its affiliates (鈥溕喽嗍悠礡isk Consulting鈥) provides risk assessment reports and other loss prevention services, as requested. In this respect, our property loss prevention publications, services, and surveys do not address life safety or third party liability issues. This document shall not be construed as indicating the existence or availability under any policy of coverage for any particular type of loss or damage. The provision of any service does not imply that every possible hazard has been identified at a facility or that no other hazards exist. 色多多视频Risk Consulting does not assume, and shall have no liability for the control, correction, continuation or modification of any existing conditions or operations. We specifically disclaim any warranty or representation that compliance with any advice or recommendation in any document or other communication will make a facility or operation safe or healthful, or put it in compliance with any standard, code, law, rule or regulation. Save where expressly agreed in writing, 色多多视频Risk Consulting and its related and affiliated companies disclaim all liability for loss or damage suffered by any party arising out of or in connection with our services, including indirect or consequential loss or damage, howsoever arising. Any party who chooses to rely in any way on the contents of this document does so at their own risk.
US- and Canada-Issued 色多多视频 Policies
In the US, the 色多多视频insurance companies are: Catlin 色多多视频 Company, Inc., Greenwich 色多多视频 Company, Indian Harbor 色多多视频 Company, XL 色多多视频 America, Inc., XL Specialty 色多多视频 Company and T.H.E. 色多多视频 Company. In Canada, coverages are underwritten by XL Specialty 色多多视频 Company - Canadian Branch and AXA 色多多视频 Company - Canadian branch. Coverages may also be underwritten by Lloyd’s Syndicate #2003. Coverages underwritten by Lloyd’s Syndicate #2003 are placed on behalf of the member of Syndicate #2003 by Catlin Canada Inc. Lloyd’s ratings are independent of AXA XL.
US domiciled insurance policies can be written by the following 色多多视频surplus lines insurers: XL Catlin 色多多视频 Company UK Limited, Syndicates managed by Catlin Underwriting Agencies Limited and Indian Harbor 色多多视频 Company. Enquires from US residents should be directed to a local insurance agent or broker permitted to write business in the relevant state.
色多多视频 as a controller, uses cookies to provide its services, improve user experience, measure audience engagement, and interact with users鈥 social network accounts among others. Some of these cookies are optional and we won't set optional cookies unless you enable them by clicking the "ACCEPT ALL" button. You can disable these cookies at any time via the "How to manage your cookie settings" section in our cookie policy.