色多多视频

Reinsurance
Explore our offerings

The liabilities associated with cyber exposures can devastate any business. A single cyber-attack in the US costs companies on average $7.91 million, according to the . In the , the most expensive data breach event included cost a company nearly $31 million to resolve while the least expensive total cost of data breach for a company included in the study was $750,000. Not to mention the potential reputation damage, loss of customer trust and more that can occur after a cyber event.

Recent headlines have shown that there is no one industry or entity size that stands alone as an easy target for cyber criminals. Manufacturers, media companies, retail operations, government agencies, and plenty of small businesses, among others, have all found themselves victims of cyberattacks. Cyber claims do not always result from an attack by cyber criminals. The threat vectors are changing in terms of complexity and purpose and result in a wide variety of claims trigger various coverages provided by AXA XL’s cyber insurance coverage. 

Consider these scenarios, taken from AXA XL’s Cyber Claims files:

Financial Services: An act of embezzlement
Total Payout: $3.5M
Coverage Section: Professional Services

This matter involved a holding company with subsidiaries that provide a variety of financial services. Three of the Company’s subsidiaries provided services in connection with an investment fund. The fund was ultimately being run as a Ponzi Scheme and the fund manager stole over $20 million from the Fund, which resulted in approximately six claims. Three of the claims made against the three subsidiaries alleged “wrongful acts” in their “professional services” as defined by the policy. The allegations were generally that, if the Company had been doing its job properly, the fraud would have been detected sooner or would not have been possible, so they breached their agreements and failed to perform the services. The demand was in excess of $20M. Ultimately, a global settlement was reached for $3.5M.

Manufacturing: A pricey disagreement
Total Payout: $750,000
Coverage Section: Technology Products and Services

A lawsuit was filed against a technology manufacturer alleging negligence and breach of contract in connection with their procurement of technology products and services. The Plaintiff alleged that the manufacturer was contractually obligated to provide products and services through a certain time period. The manufacturer disagreed. The Plaintiff alleged that failure of the manufacturer to procure their products and services resulted in the Plaintiff losing business and defaulting on their contracts which incorporated the use of the insured manufacturer’s products and services. Due to the potential liability and exposure in this situation, early resolution was sought unsuccessfully. However, once the motion for summary judgment was filed, again early resolution was attempted and ultimately, after both expert reports presented their findings on damages, the matter was settled for $500,000 (total payout includes defense costs in this matter as well as settlement).

Media: Inside Job
Total Payout: $400,000
Coverage Section: Data Breach and Crisis Management Coverage

An online media company was contacted by the FBI informing them that a hacker used a former employee’s credentials to access their network and steal 1.7 million email addresses and passwords of users of the website. Coverage was provided under the Data Breach and Crisis Management Insuring Agreement. Legal, notification, and forensics costs incurred totaled $400,000.

 

Subscribe to Fast Fast Forward

Global Asset Protection Services, LLC, and its affiliates (鈥溕喽嗍悠礡isk Consulting鈥) provides risk assessment reports and other loss prevention services, as requested. In this respect, our property loss prevention publications, services, and surveys do not address life safety or third party liability issues. This document shall not be construed as indicating the existence or availability under any policy of coverage for any particular type of loss or damage. The provision of any service does not imply that every possible hazard has been identified at a facility or that no other hazards exist. 色多多视频Risk Consulting does not assume, and shall have no liability for the control, correction, continuation or modification of any existing conditions or operations. We specifically disclaim any warranty or representation that compliance with any advice or recommendation in any document or other communication will make a facility or operation safe or healthful, or put it in compliance with any standard, code, law, rule or regulation. Save where expressly agreed in writing, 色多多视频Risk Consulting and its related and affiliated companies disclaim all liability for loss or damage suffered by any party arising out of or in connection with our services, including indirect or consequential loss or damage, howsoever arising. Any party who chooses to rely in any way on the contents of this document does so at their own risk.

US- and Canada-Issued 色多多视频 Policies

In the US, the 色多多视频insurance companies are: Catlin 色多多视频 Company, Inc., Greenwich 色多多视频 Company, Indian Harbor 色多多视频 Company, XL 色多多视频 America, Inc., XL Specialty 色多多视频 Company and T.H.E. 色多多视频 Company. In Canada, coverages are underwritten by XL Specialty 色多多视频 Company - Canadian Branch and AXA 色多多视频 Company - Canadian branch. Coverages may also be underwritten by Lloyd’s Syndicate #2003. Coverages underwritten by Lloyd’s Syndicate #2003 are placed on behalf of the member of Syndicate #2003 by Catlin Canada Inc. Lloyd’s ratings are independent of AXA XL.
US domiciled insurance policies can be written by the following 色多多视频surplus lines insurers: XL Catlin 色多多视频 Company UK Limited, Syndicates managed by Catlin Underwriting Agencies Limited and Indian Harbor 色多多视频 Company. Enquires from US residents should be directed to a local insurance agent or broker permitted to write business in the relevant state.